Very good article. Many of us made these same conclusions by May of 2020 based on our scientific degrees and experience. I’ve had the benefit of infection and contamination control as well as working in the viral vaccine industry for over a decade. People who had the appropriate background were silenced by physicians and other professionals. I taught microbiology to med students, they are not the experts here and neither are politicians and government bureaucrats.
From the Nuremberg Code (directives for human experimentation)
The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion, and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury disability or death.
The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required by him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
Anyone who reads this would agree it’s a very good article. But I’d also add that your writing style is simple but really strikes a chord deep within us - such as when you say ““mass hysteria bulldozed any voice of calm and reason”, don’t “let fear destroy the very things we were trying to protect” - which clearly you knew were also your children. My favourite is about how truth “can be buried under a ton of concrete, thrown into a volcano, or shot into the sun, but those acts won’t make it false” or “it’s still the truth, waiting for a chance to be seen, heard, spoken, and believed once again.” I feel some of these are well worth us quoting.
Going back a few thousand years. The apostle Paul set the standard of belief systems as "What is the Fruit" of the belief. He used the example of Love, Joy, Peace....
Previously, the Hebrew standard for Prophets was did the prophet's prophecies come true. Today, we have no such standards and the result is wars, migrations, homelessness, and general anger and malus. Perhaps it is time to go back to history, and look to people who bring forward good things.
Thank you so much for your article! We must not forget what happened in these C-years until it has been thoroughly dealt with. Even if in most countries - including here in Germany - a lot of things are put on the back burner, and people simply say, "A few mistakes were made," but everything else is fine now, this must never be forgotten.
To this day, I will never understand how it was possible to convince people to vaccinate also pregnant women and small children despite the experience of the thalidomide scandal.
We can see today that all the massive side effects that were predicted are actually happening. It is an unimaginable but expected disaster and it is only because it is so unimaginable that the people responsible have not yet been called to account.
The C-vaccines are the greatest crime in the history of medicine - but few people really realize it.
Very good article. Many of us made these same conclusions by May of 2020 based on our scientific degrees and experience. I’ve had the benefit of infection and contamination control as well as working in the viral vaccine industry for over a decade. People who had the appropriate background were silenced by physicians and other professionals. I taught microbiology to med students, they are not the experts here and neither are politicians and government bureaucrats.
What a brilliant article. You captured the main concepts of everything covid. Many thanks💕
You were the first person I found on Substack, and your work confirmed my suspicions that the government over reacted and over reached. Thank you.
From the Nuremberg Code (directives for human experimentation)
The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion, and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury disability or death.
The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required by him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
Thank you for helping Florida!
Anyone who reads this would agree it’s a very good article. But I’d also add that your writing style is simple but really strikes a chord deep within us - such as when you say ““mass hysteria bulldozed any voice of calm and reason”, don’t “let fear destroy the very things we were trying to protect” - which clearly you knew were also your children. My favourite is about how truth “can be buried under a ton of concrete, thrown into a volcano, or shot into the sun, but those acts won’t make it false” or “it’s still the truth, waiting for a chance to be seen, heard, spoken, and believed once again.” I feel some of these are well worth us quoting.
Thanks
Going back a few thousand years. The apostle Paul set the standard of belief systems as "What is the Fruit" of the belief. He used the example of Love, Joy, Peace....
Previously, the Hebrew standard for Prophets was did the prophet's prophecies come true. Today, we have no such standards and the result is wars, migrations, homelessness, and general anger and malus. Perhaps it is time to go back to history, and look to people who bring forward good things.
Thank you so much for your article! We must not forget what happened in these C-years until it has been thoroughly dealt with. Even if in most countries - including here in Germany - a lot of things are put on the back burner, and people simply say, "A few mistakes were made," but everything else is fine now, this must never be forgotten.
To this day, I will never understand how it was possible to convince people to vaccinate also pregnant women and small children despite the experience of the thalidomide scandal.
We can see today that all the massive side effects that were predicted are actually happening. It is an unimaginable but expected disaster and it is only because it is so unimaginable that the people responsible have not yet been called to account.
The C-vaccines are the greatest crime in the history of medicine - but few people really realize it.